Ease in FGD Systems Norms: A Balanced Step Toward Cleaner Energy or a Risky Delay?

What’s Changing in FGD Norms?

India has recently eased the compliance timeline for Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) systems—a critical pollution control mechanism in coal-based thermal power plants. These systems reduce sulphur dioxide (SO₂) emissions, a major contributor to acid rain and respiratory issues. With new extensions granted for several plants, the government aims to balance energy needs with environmental responsibility. But is this delay pragmatic or problematic?

Understanding FGD Systems & Their Role in Emission Control

Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) systems are engineered to remove SO₂ from exhaust flue gases of fossil-fuel power plants. India, being heavily dependent on coal (~70% of electricity), produces high levels of SO₂ emissions, especially from high-sulfur domestic coal.

There are two main types of FGD:

• Wet FGD (most common, uses limestone slurry)

• Dry FGD (for low-capacity units or less humid areas)

Key Benefits of FGD

• Reduces SO₂ emissions by up to 95–98%

• Controls acid rain formation

• Improves air quality around thermal power clusters

• Supports India’s National Clean Air Programme (NCAP)

Evolution of FGD Norms in India

In 2015, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) mandated power plants to install FGD systems by 2017, based on their location and age. Due to cost concerns and lack of technology readiness, the deadline was extended to 2022 and again later to 2024 and 2025 for different categories of plants.

The Latest Change

In 2024–2025, the Ministry allowed fresh extensions for over 150 GW of capacity, especially for plants in remote and non-critical zones. Plants near urban areas or with higher pollution impact still face stricter timelines.

Why Has the Government Eased the Norms?

Several factors led to the re-evaluation of FGD implementation deadlines:

Energy Security Concerns

• India faces rising electricity demand (especially during summer months).

• Shutting down plants for FGD retrofitting could disrupt grid reliability.

Cost of Compliance

• Each FGD unit can cost between ₹80–100 crore per 500 MW.

• Smaller and older plants claim economic unviability.

Technology & Equipment Delays

• Global supply chain issues (post-COVID)

• Limited domestic capacity for FGD equipment manufacturing

Push for Renewables

• The government assumes cleaner renewable energy growth will balance out thermal emissions over time.

Industry Reactions: Relief or Red Flag?

Power Sector’s View

• Welcomes the decision, citing better planning and uninterrupted supply

• Asks for financial support mechanisms for retrofitting

Environmentalists’ Concerns

• Delay may compromise air quality, especially in already polluted regions

• India remains the largest SO₂ emitter globally, despite the potential to reduce it

Public Health Angle

• Prolonged exposure to SO₂ increases respiratory ailments and cardiovascular risk

• Urban centers near non-compliant plants may see reduced air quality improvement

Regulatory Framework & Zonal Classification

India classifies thermal plants into three categories for FGD implementation:

1. Category A (High Priority Zones)

   • Within 10 km of critically polluted industrial clusters or Delhi NCR

   • Deadline: 2022-2024

2. Category B (Medium Priority Zones)

   • Within 10 km of non-attainment cities (as per CPCB)

   • Deadline: 2025

3. Category C (Low Priority Zones)

   • Remote/rural locations

   • Deadline: 2026 or relaxed upon request

Penalty for non-compliance: Rs. 0.05 to Rs. 0.20/kWh depending on delay and zone, although enforcement has been relatively lax.

The Way Forward: Balancing Development & Environment

Easing FGD norms does offer short-term relief to the power sector and ensures energy reliability, but long-term consequences must be weighed:

Accelerated FGD Deployment in High-Risk Zones

• Prioritize NCR and critically polluted areas

• Use monitoring dashboards to track compliance

Incentivize Green Upgrades

• Government could offer Viability Gap Funding (VGF) or low-interest loans

• Encourage joint ventures for domestic manufacturing of FGD tech

Integrate Renewables Faster

• Invest in grid-scale battery storage

• Increase gas-based and hybrid plants to offset SO₂-emitting units

Legal & Judicial Developments Around FGD Compliance

• The Supreme Court of India and the National Green Tribunal (NGT) have issued multiple directives over the years to ensure faster installation of pollution-control technologies, including FGD. However, enforcement has been inconsistent due to overlapping jurisdiction between central and state pollution control boards.

• State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) have varied enforcement strength—some are proactive (e.g., Gujarat, Maharashtra), while others lack the capacity or political will to penalize delays.

Global Benchmarks & Where India Stands

• Countries like China and Germany have achieved over 95% SO₂ reduction in coal-fired plants through mandatory FGD systems.

• China mandated wet FGD retrofits in over 95% of coal power stations by 2011, well ahead of India’s timeline.

• In contrast, as of 2024, less than 30% of India’s thermal capacity has fully functional FGD systems, despite being the world's largest emitter of SO₂.

Financing Bottlenecks & Proposed Solutions

• Many public and private generators (especially state electricity boards and small IPPs) lack upfront capital for FGD retrofits.

• Proposed financial models:

  • Green Bonds: Specifically allocated to air pollution mitigation

  • Carbon Credits: FGD systems could generate SO₂-offset credits in regulated markets

  • Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) revision: Passing FGD retrofit costs to end consumers through tariff adjustments

Impact on Coal Plant Life Extensions

• Plants nearing the end of their economic life (typically 25–30 years) are often exempted from installing FGDs, as retrofitting may not yield returns.

• This policy may unintentionally incentivize life extension of older, inefficient, and more polluting units, creating a regulatory loophole.

Innovation in Indigenous FGD Technology

• Several Indian PSUs like BHEL, NTPC, and L&T have started R&D into low-cost, scalable FGD modules using domestic materials like hydrated lime and gypsum recycling.

• Dry sorbent injection systems are emerging as an alternative for older/smaller units with space or water constraints.

• There’s growing interest in modular FGD units that reduce retrofitting downtime and construction footprint.

Environmental Justice & Socioeconomic Dimensions

• Many of India’s coal plants are located in or near tribal and economically backward regions (e.g., Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha), where air pollution disproportionately impacts vulnerable communities.

• The easing of norms is seen by some activists as environmental injustice, as poor communities face prolonged exposure to pollution without adequate healthcare systems.

Emerging Role of Remote Monitoring and AI

• The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) is increasingly relying on Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) and AI-driven anomaly detection to track SO₂ and NOx levels.

• Remote diagnostics can now track emission spikes in real-time, aiding in enforcement and transparency—but integration into policy remains slow.

Future Outlook with Hydrogen and Ammonia Blending

• As India explores co-firing of ammonia and hydrogen in thermal plants, it could reduce sulfur content at the source, potentially lowering the FGD burden in the long run.

• Pilot projects by NTPC in 2024 show promise, though commercial viability and retrofitting challenges remain.

The ease in FGD norms reflects a pragmatic attempt to ensure energy continuity amid rising demand and inflationary pressures. However, delaying essential emission controls poses a public health and environmental trade-off that India cannot afford for long.

Going forward, India must push for cleaner technology, stricter enforcement, and smarter policy execution to fulfill both its development goals and environmental commitments.

FAQs

Q. What is FGD, and why is it important?

• FGD stands for Flue Gas Desulfurization, which reduces sulphur dioxide emissions from thermal power plants, essential for reducing air pollution and protecting public health.

Q. Why did India delay FGD implementation?

• Due to cost burdens, supply chain disruptions, rising energy demand, and inadequate domestic capacity for FGD systems.

Q. Which plants are still required to meet original deadlines?

• Plants located in polluted zones, especially near Delhi NCR and critically polluted industrial clusters, must still comply by 2024–2025.

Q. How does this delay affect public health?

• Prolonged exposure to SO₂ can increase respiratory illnesses, especially in urban and industrial regions where emissions remain high.

Q. Are there any penalties for missing FGD deadlines?

• Yes, but enforcement has been weak. Penalties range from Rs. 0.05 to 0.20 per kWh of electricity generated without compliance.

Q. Is renewable energy growth a solution?

• Partially. While renewables help reduce overall emissions, coal-based plants will still be crucial for years. FGD is vital until a complete transition occurs.

Fuel our creativity with a cup of coffee! ☕️❤️❤️❤️